Optus Crisis: 32 Hours of Triple Zero Failure Uncovered

Rachel Wong
6 Min Read

Optus Emergency Call Outage: A Timeline of Missteps and Tragedy

In a harrowing incident that has raised serious questions about the reliability of emergency services in Australia, telecommunications giant Optus has come under fire for its handling of a significant outage affecting Triple Zero, the country’s emergency call service. The timeline of events reveals a series of miscommunications and delays that culminated in tragic consequences, including multiple fatalities.

The Initial Outage: A Slow Response

On Thursday, the crisis began to unfold around 1:30 PM when a customer reached out to Optus, reporting that calls to Triple Zero were failing. According to Optus CEO, Kelly Rue, this was the moment the company became fully aware of the severity of the situation. Early assessments indicated that the company had not responded to these emergency calls with the urgency expected in such critical circumstances.

Just twenty minutes later, at approximately 1:50 PM, South Australia Police contacted Optus to report the ongoing issues with emergency calls. It was only at this point that Optus halted a scheduled upgrade to its systems and began efforts to restore Triple Zero services. Rue stated that the company started to confirm the outage with relevant stakeholders, including police and regulatory agencies.

Welfare Checks and Delayed Notifications

As the day progressed, Optus initiated welfare checks on individuals who had attempted to contact emergency services during the outage. Rue explained that the delay in conducting these checks was due to the complexity of retrieving records from the network. Unfortunately, during these checks, Optus learned of fatalities in three households, either involving individuals who had attempted to call Triple Zero or their acquaintances.

Despite the gravity of the situation, Optus only began notifying government agencies about the outage itself, not the associated fatalities. This lack of timely communication would later prove to be a significant point of contention.

Escalation of the Crisis

By Friday, the situation had escalated further. At an unspecified time, Optus informed its board, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), and the federal government about the fatalities. South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas reached out to Rue for clarification, only to find that Optus had provided minimal information, including only the suburbs affected rather than specific contact details.

Later that day, at 5:30 PM, Optus held a press conference to address the situation, apologizing for the deaths that had occurred. This announcement came a staggering 28 hours after the company first learned of the problem and over 41 hours after the firewall upgrade began. Alarmingly, some government officials learned about the network issues for the first time during this press conference.

Rue defended the delay, stating that the company needed to confirm the facts before informing relevant agencies. However, this justification did little to quell the growing outrage.

Government and Public Reaction

The fallout from the incident was swift. Federal Communications Minister Anika Wells criticized Optus, stating that the company had “let Australians down when they needed them most.” Her comments echoed the sentiments of many who felt that the telecommunications provider had failed in its fundamental duty to ensure public safety.

As the situation continued to unfold, Western Australia Premier Roger Cook announced that a fourth individual had died as a result of the call failures. This tragic news was discovered during welfare checks conducted by WA Police, further compounding the sense of urgency and outrage surrounding the incident.

A Call for Accountability

In light of the events, there have been calls for a thorough investigation into Optus’s handling of the outage. Premier Cook expressed skepticism about the timeline provided by the company, suggesting that it should be scrutinized by the ACMA. The incident has raised broader questions about the reliability of emergency services and the responsibilities of telecommunications companies in ensuring public safety.

Rue, in a subsequent statement, expressed his condolences to the families affected by the tragedy, acknowledging the profound impact of the incident. However, many remain unconvinced that Optus has taken sufficient accountability for its actions.

Conclusion: A Wake-Up Call for Emergency Services

The Optus emergency call outage serves as a stark reminder of the critical role that telecommunications providers play in public safety. The delays and miscommunications that characterized this incident not only resulted in tragic loss of life but also highlighted systemic issues within the company’s crisis management protocols.

As Australia grapples with the implications of this incident, it is clear that a reevaluation of emergency communication systems is necessary. The public deserves assurance that when they dial Triple Zero, they can expect a prompt and effective response. The events of this week have underscored the urgent need for accountability and reform in the telecommunications sector to prevent such tragedies from occurring in the future.

Share This Article
Follow:
Rachel Wong is a business editor specializing in global markets, startups, and corporate strategies. She makes complex business developments easy to understand for both industry professionals and everyday readers.
Leave a review