Jammu and Kashmir DGP Critiques Pakistan’s Leadership at UNGA
Published on: September 27, 2025
In a pointed critique of Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, former Jammu and Kashmir Director General of Police (DGP) SP Vaid has made headlines by suggesting that Pakistan deserves a Nobel Prize for its “lies.” This statement comes in the wake of Sharif’s address at the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), where he made claims that have been met with skepticism from Indian officials.
A Controversial Address
During his speech at the UNGA, Shehbaz Sharif attempted to portray Pakistan as a victim of aggression, particularly in the context of its ongoing tensions with India. However, Vaid’s response was swift and scathing. Speaking to ANI, he accused the Pakistani government and military of inflicting violence upon their own citizens, particularly in regions like Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan.
“If there’s one nation that deserves a Nobel Prize for speaking lies, it is Pakistan,” Vaid stated. He further criticized Sharif and the military leadership, including General Asim Munir, for their alleged complicity in the suffering of their own people. Vaid’s remarks highlight a long-standing narrative in Indian discourse that questions the legitimacy of Pakistan’s claims on various international platforms.
Historical Context of Indo-Pak Relations
The relationship between India and Pakistan has been fraught with tension since the partition of British India in 1947. The two nations have fought multiple wars and have been involved in numerous skirmishes, particularly over the Kashmir region. This historical backdrop adds weight to Vaid’s comments, as both countries have often accused each other of propagating false narratives to gain international sympathy.
In recent years, the rhetoric has intensified, especially during international forums like the UNGA. The stakes are high, as both nations seek to garner support for their respective positions on issues ranging from terrorism to human rights.
India’s Response to Sharif’s Claims
In a formal rebuttal to Sharif’s address, India did not hold back. Petal Gahlot, First Secretary at India’s Permanent Mission to the UN, labeled Sharif’s speech as “absurd theatrics” and accused him of glorifying terrorism. Gahlot specifically addressed Sharif’s claims of “victory” following a military escalation in May, stating that the narrative was misleading.
According to Gahlot, the situation on the ground was clear: Pakistan’s military had been threatening further attacks on India until Indian forces effectively neutralized the threat by targeting multiple Pakistani airbases. “If destroyed runways and burnt-out hangars look like victory, as the Prime Minister claimed, Pakistan is welcome to enjoy it,” she remarked, underscoring the absurdity of Sharif’s assertions.
The Broader Implications
Vaid’s comments and India’s rebuttal at the UNGA reflect a broader strategy of countering Pakistan’s narrative on international platforms. The ongoing conflict in Kashmir and the allegations of human rights abuses in both countries complicate the discourse.
The international community has often been caught in the crossfire of these narratives, with various countries taking sides based on their geopolitical interests. The United States, for instance, has historically maintained a complex relationship with both nations, often acting as a mediator while also providing military and economic aid.
The Role of Media and Public Perception
The media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception of these issues. In India, the portrayal of Pakistan often leans towards skepticism, particularly in the context of terrorism and military aggression. Conversely, Pakistani media frequently highlights alleged human rights violations in Kashmir, framing the narrative in a way that seeks to garner international sympathy.
This dichotomy complicates the already tense relationship between the two nations, as both sides strive to control the narrative. Vaid’s comments serve as a reminder of the ongoing battle for public opinion, both domestically and internationally.
Conclusion
The exchange between SP Vaid and Shehbaz Sharif at the UNGA underscores the complexities of Indo-Pak relations. As both nations continue to navigate their historical grievances and contemporary challenges, the rhetoric surrounding their interactions remains charged. Vaid’s assertion that Pakistan deserves a Nobel Prize for its “lies” encapsulates a broader sentiment in India regarding Pakistan’s narrative on the global stage.
As the international community watches closely, the stakes remain high for both nations, with the potential for dialogue overshadowed by a history of mistrust and conflict. The future of Indo-Pak relations may depend on the ability of both sides to move beyond rhetoric and engage in meaningful dialogue that addresses the root causes of their longstanding disputes.
