Afghanistan Rejects Trump’s Call for U.S. Military Return to Bagram Airbase
In a significant diplomatic exchange, Afghanistan has firmly rejected former President Donald Trump‘s recent call for the United States military to return to the country and reclaim the strategically important Bagram airbase. This development underscores the complex and evolving relationship between the U.S. and Afghanistan, particularly in the wake of the Taliban’s return to power in 2021.
Background on Bagram Airbase
Bagram Airbase, located just north of Kabul, has been a focal point of U.S. military operations in Afghanistan since the onset of the War on Terror in 2001. The base served not only as a military hub but also housed a controversial prison where numerous detainees were held without trial, often facing allegations of abuse and torture. The facility was pivotal during the two-decade U.S. presence in Afghanistan, facilitating operations against the Taliban and al-Qaeda.
In August 2021, as U.S. forces withdrew from Afghanistan, the Taliban swiftly regained control of Bagram, marking a significant turning point in the country’s political landscape. The airbase’s fall to the Taliban symbolized the end of an era for U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan, raising questions about the future of U.S.-Afghan relations.
Trump’s Statements and Taliban’s Response
On September 19, 2025, Trump reiterated his desire for the U.S. to reclaim Bagram, emphasizing its strategic importance due to its proximity to China. “We’re trying to get it back,” Trump stated, lamenting that the U.S. had “given it to [the Taliban] for nothing.” He highlighted the base’s location, noting it is “exactly one hour away from where China makes its nuclear missiles.”
In response, Afghan officials, including Zakir Jalal from the foreign ministry, made it clear that while Afghanistan is open to engaging with the U.S., it will not permit any military presence on its soil. Jalal stated, “Afghanistan and the United States need to engage with one another … without the United States maintaining any military presence in any part of Afghanistan.” He emphasized the need for a relationship based on “mutual respect and shared interests.”
Historical Context and Implications
The rejection of U.S. military presence reflects a broader sentiment within Afghanistan, where many citizens and officials are wary of foreign intervention following decades of conflict. The U.S. invasion in 2001 was initially welcomed by many Afghans seeking to overthrow the Taliban regime. However, over the years, the prolonged military presence led to significant civilian casualties and widespread disillusionment.
The Taliban’s return to power has shifted the dynamics of international relations in the region. The group is keen to establish itself as a legitimate government, seeking recognition and economic partnerships without the shadow of foreign military influence. This stance is indicative of a broader trend in international relations, where nations are increasingly advocating for sovereignty and non-interference.
Diplomatic Engagements
Trump’s recent comments come amid reports of ongoing discussions between U.S. officials and Taliban representatives. Notably, Adam Boehler, a special envoy, and Zalmay Khalilzad, a former U.S. envoy for Afghanistan, met with Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi in Kabul. These talks reportedly focused on American citizens detained in Afghanistan, highlighting the complexities of the current diplomatic landscape.
U.S. officials have been contemplating the possibility of re-establishing a presence at Bagram since at least March 2025. Proponents of this idea argue that the airfield could serve as leverage not only for security concerns but also for accessing Afghanistan’s rich mineral resources, which have garnered interest from various global powers.
The Broader Geopolitical Landscape
The strategic significance of Bagram extends beyond Afghanistan’s borders. Its location near China, a rising global power, has made it a point of interest for U.S. policymakers. The geopolitical implications of a U.S. presence in the region could influence not only U.S.-China relations but also the broader balance of power in Central Asia.
Historically, Afghanistan has been a crossroads for empires and nations, from the British Empire to the Soviet Union, each seeking to exert influence over this pivotal region. The current situation reflects a continuation of this historical narrative, where control over Afghanistan’s territory and resources remains a contentious issue.
Conclusion
As Afghanistan navigates its post-Taliban reality, the rejection of U.S. military presence at Bagram signifies a critical juncture in its foreign relations. The Taliban’s insistence on sovereignty and non-interference highlights a desire to redefine its role on the global stage. Meanwhile, the U.S. grapples with the implications of its withdrawal and the evolving geopolitical landscape in Central Asia. The future of U.S.-Afghan relations remains uncertain, but the dialogue between the two nations will likely continue to shape the region’s political dynamics for years to come.
