BCCI to Protest Against Mohsin Naqvi‘s Conduct at Asia Cup 2025
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is set to escalate tensions with the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) by lodging a formal protest against its president, Mohsin Naqvi. This decision comes in the wake of a controversial incident during the Asia Cup 2025 final, where Indian players notably refused to accept the trophy from Naqvi, who also serves as Pakistan’s Interior Minister and head of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB). The post-match presentation, which was delayed by 45 minutes, ended abruptly as the Indian team declined any interaction with Naqvi on stage.
A Controversial Conclusion to the Asia Cup
The Asia Cup 2025 concluded with heightened drama, as the trophy was conspicuously absent during the presentation ceremony. Reports indicate that Naqvi insisted on personally handing over the trophy to the Indian team, despite their clear objections. This incident has not only raised eyebrows but has also sparked discussions about the responsibilities of an ACC president, particularly in maintaining neutrality during such high-stakes events.
Throughout the tournament, Naqvi has been embroiled in various controversies, often perceived as favoring Pakistan over the spirit of the game. His actions included demanding the removal of match referee Pycroft and even threatening to boycott the tournament if his demands were not met. Such behavior has led many to question his suitability for the role of ACC president, a position that ideally requires impartiality and fairness.
Social Media Controversies
Adding fuel to the fire, Naqvi recently shared a controversial video on social media that many interpreted as a mockery of Indian fans. The video referenced Pakistan’s claims of downing Indian fighter jets during Operation Sindoor, albeit in a veiled manner. By sharing a clip of Cristiano Ronaldo, Naqvi’s intent was perceived as an attempt to provoke Indian supporters, further complicating his already contentious position.
BCCI Secretary Devajit Saikia expressed the board’s frustration, stating, “We have decided not to accept the Asia Cup 2025 trophy from the ACC chairman, who happens to be one of the senior leaders of Pakistan. This does not give him the right to take the trophy and the medals with him. It is extremely unfortunate and unsportsmanlike.” Saikia emphasized the need for the trophy and medals to be returned to India promptly.
Upcoming ICC Conference
The BCCI plans to voice its grievances at the upcoming ICC conference scheduled for November in Dubai. Saikia confirmed, “At that conference, we will launch a very serious and strong protest against the actions of the ACC chairman.” This move underscores the BCCI’s commitment to addressing what it perceives as a breach of sportsmanship and protocol.
Absence of BCCI Officials
Interestingly, no BCCI officials were present at the Dubai International Stadium during the Asia Cup final. The board had convened its Annual General Meeting (AGM) on the same day, where Mithun Manhas was officially appointed as the 37th President. Saikia was reinstated as secretary, while Rajeev Shukla retained his position as vice-president. The absence of BCCI officials at such a crucial match raises questions about the board’s strategic planning and engagement in international cricket affairs.
A Look Back at the Final
In terms of cricketing performance, the Asia Cup 2025 final saw India successfully chase down a target of 147 runs, thanks to a stellar 69-run innings from Tilak Varma. Earlier, Kuldeep Yadav’s impressive bowling performance, which included four wickets, had restricted Pakistan to a mere 146 runs in just 20 overs. This victory not only solidified India’s dominance in the tournament but also highlighted the stark contrast between the on-field achievements and the off-field controversies.
Historical Context
The tensions between India and Pakistan in cricket are not new. Historically, matches between these two nations have been charged with emotion, often reflecting broader geopolitical issues. The Asia Cup, a tournament that aims to foster camaraderie among Asian cricketing nations, has frequently been marred by political undertones. The current situation with Naqvi adds another layer to this complex relationship, raising questions about the future of cricket diplomacy in the region.
Conclusion
As the BCCI prepares to take a stand against Mohsin Naqvi’s conduct, the implications of this protest could resonate beyond the cricketing world. The incident serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between sports and politics, particularly in a region where cricket is more than just a game; it is a source of national pride and identity. The upcoming ICC conference will be a critical platform for the BCCI to articulate its concerns and seek accountability, setting the stage for future interactions within the Asian cricketing community.
