Kamala Harris Reflects on Biden’s Impact on Her Presidential Bid in New Book

In a revealing new book, former Vice President Kamala Harris discusses the challenges she faced during her 2024 presidential campaign, attributing some of her struggles to President Joe Biden‘s declining popularity. Harris’s candid reflections provide insight into the complex dynamics of the Biden administration and its foreign policy, particularly regarding the ongoing conflict in Gaza.

A Complicated Relationship with Foreign Policy

Harris’s book, titled 107 Days, was released recently and has already sparked significant discussion. One of the key points she raises is the perceived “blank check” that Biden extended to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the Gaza conflict. According to Axios, Harris expressed her frustration that Biden did not show the same empathy for Palestinian civilians as he did for Ukrainians suffering from the Russian invasion.

“I had pleaded with Joe, when he spoke publicly on this issue, to extend the same empathy he showed to the suffering of Ukrainians to the suffering of innocent Gazan civilians,” she wrote. This statement underscores a growing concern among some Democrats about the administration’s approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict, which has historically been a contentious issue within the party.

The Political Fallout

Harris’s comments come at a time when Biden’s approval ratings have been slipping, particularly among younger voters and progressives who are increasingly vocal about their concerns regarding U.S. foreign policy. The former vice president’s assertion that Biden’s handling of the Gaza situation negatively impacted her campaign reflects a broader sentiment within the Democratic Party. Many party members are calling for a more balanced approach to foreign policy that considers the humanitarian implications of military actions.

In her book, Harris notes that Netanyahu preferred Donald Trump over Biden, stating, “Netanyahu wanted Trump in the seat opposite him. Not Joe, not me.” This observation highlights the shifting alliances and perceptions in international politics, particularly in the context of U.S.-Israel relations.

The Electoral Landscape

Harris’s campaign ultimately fell short, as she lost both the Electoral College and the popular vote to Trump in the 2024 election. This defeat has led to questions about the future of her political career and the Democratic Party’s direction. The internal divisions over foreign policy, particularly regarding Israel and Palestine, may have played a significant role in shaping voter sentiment.

In her reflections, Harris acknowledges the complexities of the situation, stating, “I believe Israel was right to respond to the atrocities of October 7. But the ferocity of Netanyahu’s response, the number of innocent Palestinian women and children killed, and his failure to prioritize the lives of the hostages had weakened Israel’s moral position internationally and created angry dissent within Israel itself.” This nuanced perspective may resonate with voters who are increasingly concerned about the humanitarian costs of military actions.

A Call for Empathy

Harris’s emphasis on empathy in foreign policy is not just a personal plea; it reflects a growing demand among constituents for a more compassionate approach to international relations. The Biden administration has faced criticism for its perceived lack of sensitivity to the plight of civilians caught in conflict zones. Harris’s call for a more empathetic stance could serve as a rallying point for those advocating for a shift in U.S. foreign policy.

A December 2023 article from Politico highlighted Harris’s push for the White House to adopt a more sympathetic tone toward Palestinians. Her press secretary, Kirsten Allen, stated that “there is no daylight between the president and the vice president,” emphasizing their shared commitment to Israel’s right to defend itself while also advocating for humanitarian aid and the protection of innocent civilians.

The Future of the Democratic Party

As the Democratic Party navigates its internal divisions, Harris’s reflections may serve as a catalyst for broader discussions about the party’s future direction. The tension between traditional pro-Israel stances and the growing calls for Palestinian rights is likely to shape the party’s platform in the coming years.

Harris’s candidness about her experiences and the challenges she faced during her campaign may resonate with voters who feel disillusioned by the current political landscape. Her emphasis on empathy and the need for a more balanced approach to foreign policy could attract younger voters who prioritize humanitarian issues.

Conclusion

Kamala Harris’s new book offers a revealing look into the complexities of her presidential campaign and the broader challenges facing the Democratic Party. By addressing the impact of Biden’s foreign policy on her candidacy, Harris highlights the need for a more empathetic approach to international relations. As the party grapples with its internal divisions, her reflections may serve as a guiding light for a more compassionate and balanced foreign policy in the future. The ongoing discourse surrounding these issues will undoubtedly shape the political landscape as the 2024 election cycle continues to unfold.