COVID Vaccine: Uncovering Injury Compensation Gaps

David H. Johnson
12 Min Read

The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: A Closer Look at COVID-19 Vaccine Claims

Vaccines have long been heralded as one of the most significant public health achievements, credited with saving over 150 million lives in the last half-century. From eradicating smallpox to controlling polio, vaccines have transformed global health. However, as with any medical intervention, they can occasionally lead to adverse effects. This week, a segment on 60 Minutes by correspondent Jon Wertheim sheds light on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), a legal framework designed to compensate individuals who claim to have been injured by vaccines. The discussion is particularly timely as it addresses the complexities surrounding claims related to COVID-19 vaccinations.

The Origins of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

The VICP was established in the 1980s in response to a public health crisis surrounding the DTP vaccine, an earlier version of the DTaP vaccine used today. During this period, numerous families successfully sued vaccine manufacturers, leading to a significant decline in the production of the DTP vaccine. Concerned that this trend could jeopardize public health, Congress enacted a bipartisan bill to create the VICP. This program aimed to balance the acknowledgment of potential vaccine-related injuries with the need to protect manufacturers from excessive liability, thereby ensuring the continued availability of vaccines.

The VICP operates as a no-fault system, allowing individuals to seek compensation without proving negligence on the part of vaccine manufacturers. Instead, claimants must demonstrate that their injury was more likely than not caused by the vaccine. The program is funded through a 75-cent tax levied on each dose of recommended childhood vaccinations. Since its inception, approximately 12,000 claims have resulted in nearly $5 billion in compensation.

The Vaccine Injury Table: Expanding Coverage

Initially, the Vaccine Injury Table included just six vaccines, but it has since expanded to cover 16 immunizations, including the seasonal flu vaccine and the HPV vaccine. While vaccine-related injuries are rare, they can range from minor physical injuries to severe neurological conditions. The VICP provides a streamlined process for those affected, allowing them to receive compensation without the lengthy litigation typically associated with personal injury claims.

The Current Landscape of COVID-19 Vaccine Claims

As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, the vaccines developed to combat the virus were not included in the VICP. Instead, they fall under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act), which was enacted in 2005 to facilitate rapid public health responses during emergencies. This legislation offers manufacturers and healthcare providers legal protections against most lawsuits related to emergency medical treatments, including vaccines.

Individuals who suffer serious harm or death due to COVID-19 vaccines may seek compensation through the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). However, this program is more restrictive than the VICP, with a one-year statute of limitations and limited compensation options. To date, around 14,000 claims have been filed under the CICP, with approximately 5,000 denied and fewer than 100 compensated, primarily for cases of myocarditis.

Public health organizations, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), maintain that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, having undergone rigorous clinical trials. As of May, over 676 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered in the United States.

Advocating for Inclusion in the VICP

Legal experts are increasingly advocating for the inclusion of COVID-19 vaccines in the VICP. Renée Gentry, a prominent vaccine injury litigator and head of the Vaccine Injury Litigation Clinic at George Washington University Law School, argues that individuals who received the vaccine in good faith to protect themselves and their communities should not be left without adequate compensation.

For COVID-19 vaccines to be added to the VICP, several steps must occur. First, the CDC would need to recommend the COVID-19 vaccine as a routine childhood vaccination. Recently, the CDC’s advisory committee suggested that parents consult healthcare providers regarding COVID-19 vaccinations for children over six months old.

Next, Congress would need to enact an excise tax on COVID-19 vaccinations to fund the VICP. Finally, the Secretary of Health and Human Services would have to include the COVID-19 vaccine on the Vaccine Injury Table. Currently, the PREP Act provides liability protections for vaccine manufacturers and distributors through 2029, complicating the timeline for these changes.

Challenges and Concerns

One of the primary concerns regarding the addition of COVID-19 vaccines to the VICP is the potential backlog of claims. The number of special masters-judges who adjudicate claims-has remained at eight since the late 1980s, despite a significant increase in cases. Gentry warns that without additional resources, the system could become overwhelmed, particularly given the 10,000 unresolved cases in the CICP related to COVID-19.

The chief special master of the vaccine court has echoed these concerns, stating that the court’s ability to efficiently resolve claims would be severely hampered if COVID-19 vaccines were added without an increase in judicial resources.

Despite these challenges, many experts believe that including COVID-19 vaccines in the VICP would ultimately benefit public health. Retired special master Denise Vowell emphasizes that while all medical interventions carry some risk, the overall benefits of vaccination far outweigh the potential downsides. She points to historical data showing a dramatic decline in childhood mortality rates due to vaccine-preventable diseases.

Conclusion

The discussion surrounding the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and COVID-19 vaccines highlights the delicate balance between public health and individual rights. As the pandemic continues to evolve, the need for a fair and efficient compensation system for vaccine-related injuries becomes increasingly critical. While the VICP has successfully compensated thousands of individuals over the years, the unique circumstances surrounding COVID-19 vaccinations present new challenges that require careful consideration and action from lawmakers and public health officials alike. The ongoing dialogue will be essential in ensuring that those who have suffered as a result of vaccination are not left without recourse, while also maintaining public confidence in the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

Share This Article
David H. Johnson is a veteran political analyst with more than 15 years of experience reporting on U.S. domestic policy and global diplomacy. He delivers balanced coverage of Congress, elections, and international relations with a focus on facts and clarity.
Leave a review