Joe Burrow Foundation Dismisses Board Member Over Controversial Comments
In a significant move reflecting its commitment to values of respect and accountability, the Joe Burrow Foundation has terminated the advisory board membership of Ted Berry, an Ohio judge. This decision comes in the wake of Berry’s insensitive remarks regarding the recent death of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, who was tragically shot during a speaking event in Utah.
Background on the Incident
Charlie Kirk, a prominent figure in conservative circles and founder of the organization Turning Point USA, was shot on September 10, 2025, while addressing an audience at Utah Valley University. The incident has sparked widespread outrage and discussions about political violence, gun control, and the responsibilities of public figures in shaping discourse. Kirk’s death has not only raised questions about safety at public events but has also ignited a fierce debate about the tone of political rhetoric in the United States.
In the aftermath of this tragic event, Ted Berry took to social media to express his views, which many found to be deeply offensive. His comments included phrases such as “Rest in Hatred & Division!” in response to tributes honoring Kirk. Berry further commented on Kirk’s legacy, suggesting that he “spewed hate & division,” and questioned how Kirk would feel about gun violence in the afterlife.
Foundation’s Response
The Joe Burrow Foundation, established by Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow in 2022, aims to provide resources and support to underprivileged and underserved communities. The foundation’s mission is rooted in the belief that everyone has a responsibility to contribute positively to society. In light of Berry’s comments, the foundation released a statement emphasizing that his views do not align with their values.
“The Joe Burrow Foundation was founded on the belief that everybody has the responsibility to do good,” the statement read. “We have terminated an advisory board member that made inappropriate remarks in light of recent events and they are no longer associated with the Foundation. Their comments do not reflect our values or our mission. We are committed to accountability and respect for all.”
Berry’s dismissal underscores the foundation’s commitment to maintaining a respectful and supportive environment, especially in the wake of a tragedy that has affected many.
Berry’s Reaction
In response to his termination, Ted Berry expressed regret for any division his comments may have caused. He stated, “I regret if I caused division. That was not my intent. And I hope there can be peace.” Despite his claims of not condoning violence, the nature of his comments has drawn significant backlash, highlighting the delicate balance public figures must navigate when discussing sensitive topics.
Broader Implications in the Sports Community
Berry is not alone in facing repercussions for comments related to Kirk’s death. The sports community has seen a wave of firings and resignations in response to insensitive remarks. For instance, Charlie Rock, a communications coordinator for the Carolina Panthers, was dismissed for his posts on social media regarding the incident. Similarly, Gerald Bourguet, a beat reporter for the Phoenix Suns, lost his job due to comments made on X, formerly known as Twitter.
These incidents reflect a growing trend in which organizations are taking a stand against inflammatory rhetoric, particularly in the context of political violence. The sports world, often seen as a microcosm of society, is increasingly scrutinizing the behavior and statements of its members, especially in light of the heightened political tensions in recent years.
The Role of Social Media
The rise of social media has transformed the way public figures communicate and engage with their audiences. While it offers a platform for direct interaction, it also amplifies the consequences of careless or inflammatory remarks. In Berry’s case, his comments quickly garnered attention, leading to widespread criticism and ultimately his dismissal from the Joe Burrow Foundation.
This incident serves as a reminder of the power of words and the responsibility that comes with public discourse. In an era where social media can shape narratives and influence public opinion, individuals must be mindful of the impact their statements can have, particularly in sensitive contexts.
Conclusion
The termination of Ted Berry from the Joe Burrow Foundation highlights the importance of accountability and respect in public discourse, especially following tragic events like the death of Charlie Kirk. As society grapples with issues of political violence and the responsibilities of public figures, organizations are increasingly taking a stand against divisive rhetoric. The actions of the Joe Burrow Foundation serve as a reminder that words matter, and that fostering a culture of respect and understanding is essential in navigating the complexities of contemporary discourse.
