Pakistan Warned: ‘Never Play Against India’ After Asia Cup Row

Liam O’Connor
4 Min Read

Tensions Rise in Cricket: Pakistan’s Kamran Akmal Calls for Boycott Against India After Asia Cup Controversy

In a dramatic turn of events following the Asia Cup 2025 final, former Pakistan wicketkeeper-batter Kamran Akmal has urged the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) to take a firm stand against India, suggesting that the national team should refuse to play against their rivals in future multi-nation tournaments. This call to action comes after a contentious post-match presentation ceremony that has ignited a firestorm of reactions within Pakistan’s cricketing community.

The Controversial Presentation Ceremony

India clinched the Asia Cup title by defeating Pakistan by five wickets, but the post-match atmosphere was anything but celebratory. The ceremony was delayed by 45 minutes as Indian players, led by captain Suryakumar Yadav, declined to accept the trophy from Mohsin Naqvi, the head of the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) and the PCB’s chairman. This refusal was rooted in Naqvi’s previous social media posts, which expressed anti-India sentiments during the tournament, raising questions about his impartiality in the role of ACC president.

Naqvi’s actions have drawn scrutiny, particularly his public support for Pakistan’s interests, including a controversial request to remove match referee Andy Pycroft after a handshake incident during a group stage match between the two nations. The refusal to accept the trophy from Naqvi has led to widespread outrage in Pakistan, with many viewing it as a slight against the country.

Akmal’s Strong Stance

In an interview with ARY News, Akmal did not hold back, stating, “The Pakistan board should immediately say that ‘we should never play against India.’ Let’s see what action the ICC takes.” He expressed skepticism about the International Cricket Council’s (ICC) ability to address the situation, given that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) holds significant influence within the organization.

Akmal’s comments reflect a growing sentiment among some Pakistani cricket fans and analysts who believe that the ongoing tensions between the two nations should extend beyond the cricket field. He suggested that a neutral committee, composed of representatives from countries like Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand, should be formed to address the issues arising from the tournament.

Accusations of “Cheap Behaviour”

Akmal did not shy away from labeling India’s actions as “cheap behaviour,” a sentiment that resonates with many in Pakistan’s cricketing circles. Throughout the Asia Cup, India maintained an undefeated record, but the atmosphere was charged with tension. The group stage match was marred by a refusal from Indian players to shake hands with their Pakistani counterparts, a gesture that many interpreted as a response to the tragic Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives.

The Super 4s match further escalated tensions, with Pakistani bowlers Shaheen Shah Afridi and Haris Rauf engaging in verbal exchanges with Indian batsmen Shubman Gill and Abhishek Sharma. The competitive spirit reached a boiling point when Sahibzada Farhan celebrated his half-century with a gun gesture, further intensifying the rivalry.

Akmal contended that while both teams displayed competitive fervor, it was India that crossed the line. “This cheap behaviour we shall keep seeing from India. They have done as much damage to cricket as they could,” he remarked, emphasizing the need for the PCB to take a stand.

Historical Context of Indo-Pak Cricket Rivalry

The cricket rivalry between India and Pakistan is one of the most intense in the sport’s history, steeped in political and cultural tensions that date back decades. Matches between the two nations are often charged with emotion, drawing millions of viewers and creating a unique atmosphere that transcends the sport itself. However, this rivalry has also been marred by incidents of hostility, both on and off the field.

The Asia Cup, a tournament that has historically showcased the best of Asian cricket, has often been a stage for these tensions to play out. The 2025 edition was no exception, with the backdrop of political strife and social media controversies amplifying the stakes.

The Role of the PCB and ACC

The PCB and ACC find themselves at a crossroads, facing pressure from fans and former players alike to address the growing rift. Akmal’s call for a boycott against India raises questions about the future of cricketing relations between the two nations. The PCB has historically sought to engage with India, recognizing the financial and sporting benefits of such matches. However, the recent events may force a reevaluation of this approach.

The ACC, under Naqvi’s leadership, is also under scrutiny. Critics argue that the organization must prioritize neutrality and fairness, especially in a tournament that aims to unite Asian cricketing nations. The perception of bias can undermine the integrity of the sport and alienate fans.

Conclusion: A Pivotal Moment for Cricket

As the dust settles on the Asia Cup 2025, the implications of this controversy extend beyond the cricket field. Akmal’s call for a boycott against India reflects a broader sentiment among some Pakistani cricket fans who feel that the integrity of the sport is at stake. The PCB and ACC must navigate these turbulent waters carefully, balancing the rich history of Indo-Pak cricket with the need for fair play and mutual respect.

The future of cricketing relations between India and Pakistan hangs in the balance, and how both boards respond to this incident will likely shape the narrative for years to come. As the cricketing world watches closely, the hope remains that the spirit of the game can prevail over political tensions, allowing for a more harmonious future in the sport.

Share This Article
Follow:
Liam O’Connor is a senior sports journalist who has covered the Olympics, FIFA World Cup, and NBA Finals. His reporting spans cricket, football, basketball, and emerging sports, highlighting both competition and human stories.
Leave a review